Threatfox vs PayMCP
Side-by-side comparison of two Model Context Protocol servers. Pick the right one for Claude Desktop, Claude Code, or Cursor.
Enables searching for indicators of compromise from ThreatFox by file hash (MD5/SHA1/SHA256) or malware family name.
Comparison
| Feature | Threatfox | PayMCP |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing | Free | Free |
| Installs | — | 2 |
| Rating | — | — |
| Verified | — | |
| Hosted | Hosted | — |
| Tools | — | — |
| Category | development | development |
| Author | pipeworx-io | blustAI |
| Repo | pipeworx-io/mcp-threatfox | blustAI/paymcp |
When to pick Threatfox
Enables searching for indicators of compromise from ThreatFox by file hash (MD5/SHA1/SHA256) or malware family name.
When to pick PayMCP
Lightweight payments layer for MCP servers: turn tools into paid endpoints with a two-line decorator. [PyPI](https://pypi.org/project/paymcp/) · [npm](https://www.npmjs.com/package/paymcp) · [TS repo](https://github.com/blustAI/paymcp-ts)
Looking for something else? Browse all MCPs or check trending this week.