Sanctions Screening vs PayMCP
Side-by-side comparison of two Model Context Protocol servers. Pick the right one for Claude Desktop, Claude Code, or Cursor.
Screens names against the US Consolidated Screening List including OFAC SDN and BIS Entity List, keyless.
Comparison
| Feature | Sanctions Screening | PayMCP |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing | Free | Free |
| Installs | — | 2 |
| Rating | — | — |
| Verified | — | |
| Hosted | Hosted | — |
| Tools | — | — |
| Category | development | development |
| Author | pipeworx-io | blustAI |
| Repo | pipeworx-io/mcp-sanctions-screening | blustAI/paymcp |
When to pick Sanctions Screening
Screens names against the US Consolidated Screening List including OFAC SDN and BIS Entity List, keyless.
When to pick PayMCP
Lightweight payments layer for MCP servers: turn tools into paid endpoints with a two-line decorator. [PyPI](https://pypi.org/project/paymcp/) · [npm](https://www.npmjs.com/package/paymcp) · [TS repo](https://github.com/blustAI/paymcp-ts)
Looking for something else? Browse all MCPs or check trending this week.